Argentina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Argentina
54 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
52.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
41st
Papua New Guinea rank
42nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Argentina
  • Papua New Guinea
050100150199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 54 real chained 2019 US$ against 52.49 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 1.51 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Argentina ranks 41st and Papua New Guinea ranks 42nd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 68.66 real chained 2019 US$ 130.43 real chained 2019 US$ 61.77 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 57.09 real chained 2019 US$ 89.66 real chained 2019 US$ 32.57 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2010s 54.42 real chained 2019 US$ 60.79 real chained 2019 US$ 6.37 real chained 2019 US$ Papua New Guinea
2020s 54 real chained 2019 US$ 52.49 real chained 2019 US$ 1.51 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Argentina or Papua New Guinea?
Argentina, at 54 real chained 2019 US$ against 52.49 real chained 2019 US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Argentina and Papua New Guinea?
1.51 real chained 2019 US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Argentina ranks 41st and Papua New Guinea ranks 42nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/papua-new-guinea/">Argentina vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.