Angola vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries

Angola
64.63 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Philippines
64.08 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Angola rank
38th
Philippines rank
39th

Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries over time

  • Angola
  • Philippines
75100125150175199520072020

How they compare

Angola currently reports 64.63 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines, a difference of 0.55 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 39th of 151 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 169.84 real chained 2019 US$ 135.35 real chained 2019 US$ 34.49 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2000s 121.7 real chained 2019 US$ 102.7 real chained 2019 US$ 19.01 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2010s 80.28 real chained 2019 US$ 75.06 real chained 2019 US$ 5.22 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2020s 64.63 real chained 2019 US$ 64.08 real chained 2019 US$ 0.5527 real chained 2019 US$ Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries, Angola or Philippines?
Angola, at 64.63 real chained 2019 US$ against 64.08 real chained 2019 US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries between Angola and Philippines?
0.55 real chained 2019 US$, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Philippines?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Philippines rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries?
Angola ranks 38th and Philippines ranks 39th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/angola/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/angola/philippines/">Angola vs Philippines: Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.