Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Saint Lucia
2,768 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
2,769 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia rank
80th
Suriname rank
79th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 2,769 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ in Saint Lucia, a difference of 1 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 80th and Suriname ranks 79th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 5,357 real chained 2019 US$ 3,912 real chained 2019 US$ 1,446 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2000s 3,512 real chained 2019 US$ 3,033 real chained 2019 US$ 478.69 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2010s 2,835 real chained 2019 US$ 2,896 real chained 2019 US$ 61.22 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ 2,769 real chained 2019 US$ 1.1 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Saint Lucia or Suriname?
Suriname, at 2,769 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ in Saint Lucia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Saint Lucia and Suriname?
1 real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Saint Lucia and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Saint Lucia ranks 80th and Suriname ranks 79th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/st-lucia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/st-lucia/suriname/">Saint Lucia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.