Mexico vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Mexico
3,076 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
2,984 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
68th
Uruguay rank
71st

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Mexico
  • Uruguay
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,984 real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 92 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 4,555 real chained 2019 US$ 3,352 real chained 2019 US$ 1,202 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 4,046 real chained 2019 US$ 3,250 real chained 2019 US$ 795.5 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 3,315 real chained 2019 US$ 3,071 real chained 2019 US$ 243.07 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ 2,984 real chained 2019 US$ 91.8 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Mexico or Uruguay?
Mexico, at 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,984 real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Mexico and Uruguay?
92 real chained 2019 US$, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Mexico ranks 68th and Uruguay ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/uruguay/">Mexico vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.