Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Mexico
3,076 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
3,224 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mexico rank
68th
Sri Lanka rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Mexico
  • Sri Lanka
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199520072020

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 3,224 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico, a difference of 148 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 4,555 real chained 2019 US$ 3,178 real chained 2019 US$ 1,377 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2000s 4,046 real chained 2019 US$ 3,114 real chained 2019 US$ 932.37 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2010s 3,315 real chained 2019 US$ 3,244 real chained 2019 US$ 70.99 real chained 2019 US$ Mexico
2020s 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ 3,224 real chained 2019 US$ 148.26 real chained 2019 US$ Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Mexico or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 3,224 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,076 real chained 2019 US$ in Mexico as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Mexico and Sri Lanka?
148 real chained 2019 US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Sri Lanka?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mexico and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Mexico ranks 68th and Sri Lanka ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/mexico/sri-lanka/">Mexico vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.