Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Madagascar
1,924 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mongolia
1,941 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Madagascar rank
113th
Mongolia rank
112th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Madagascar
  • Mongolia
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1,941 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,924 real chained 2019 US$ in Madagascar, a difference of 17 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Madagascar ahead.

Madagascar ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 112th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,388 real chained 2019 US$ 2,980 real chained 2019 US$ 407.86 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2000s 2,938 real chained 2019 US$ 2,654 real chained 2019 US$ 283.9 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2010s 2,222 real chained 2019 US$ 2,198 real chained 2019 US$ 23.75 real chained 2019 US$ Madagascar
2020s 1,924 real chained 2019 US$ 1,941 real chained 2019 US$ 17.68 real chained 2019 US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Madagascar or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 1,941 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,924 real chained 2019 US$ in Madagascar as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Madagascar and Mongolia?
17 real chained 2019 US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Madagascar and Mongolia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Madagascar ranks 113th and Mongolia ranks 112th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/madagascar/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/madagascar/mongolia/">Madagascar vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.