Latvia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Latvia
6,598 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tunisia
6,904 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
18th
Tunisia rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Latvia
  • Tunisia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 6,904 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 306 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 151 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,624 real chained 2019 US$ 8,489 real chained 2019 US$ 3,865 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2000s 4,837 real chained 2019 US$ 8,144 real chained 2019 US$ 3,307 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2010s 6,038 real chained 2019 US$ 7,406 real chained 2019 US$ 1,367 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia
2020s 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ 6,904 real chained 2019 US$ 306.22 real chained 2019 US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Latvia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 6,904 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Latvia and Tunisia?
306 real chained 2019 US$, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Latvia ranks 18th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/tunisia/">Latvia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.