Latvia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Latvia
6,598 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
6,571 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
18th
Serbia rank
19th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Latvia
  • Serbia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 27 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Latvia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 19th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 5,370 real chained 2019 US$ 6,274 real chained 2019 US$ 904.15 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 6,038 real chained 2019 US$ 6,341 real chained 2019 US$ 303.1 real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ 26.75 real chained 2019 US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Latvia or Serbia?
Latvia, at 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Latvia and Serbia?
27 real chained 2019 US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Latvia ranks 18th and Serbia ranks 19th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/serbia/">Latvia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.