Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Latvia
6,598 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
6,430 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
18th
Malawi rank
21st

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Latvia
  • Malawi
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k199520072020

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,430 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi, a difference of 168 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Latvia ranks 18th and Malawi ranks 21st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 4,624 real chained 2019 US$ 9,362 real chained 2019 US$ 4,738 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 4,837 real chained 2019 US$ 8,860 real chained 2019 US$ 4,023 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 6,038 real chained 2019 US$ 7,469 real chained 2019 US$ 1,431 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ 6,430 real chained 2019 US$ 167.92 real chained 2019 US$ Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Latvia or Malawi?
Latvia, at 6,598 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,430 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Latvia and Malawi?
168 real chained 2019 US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Latvia ranks 18th and Malawi ranks 21st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/malawi/">Latvia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.