Kyrgyzstan vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Kyrgyzstan
2,844 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovenia
2,787 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
75th
Slovenia rank
77th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Slovenia
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 2,844 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 57 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 75th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 151 countries.

Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,092 real chained 2019 US$ 2,463 real chained 2019 US$ 1,629 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2000s 3,781 real chained 2019 US$ 2,524 real chained 2019 US$ 1,257 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2010s 3,225 real chained 2019 US$ 2,863 real chained 2019 US$ 362.33 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan
2020s 2,844 real chained 2019 US$ 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ 56.72 real chained 2019 US$ Kyrgyzstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Kyrgyzstan or Slovenia?
Kyrgyzstan, at 2,844 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Kyrgyzstan and Slovenia?
57 real chained 2019 US$, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Slovenia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 75th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/kyrgyz-republic/slovenia/">Kyrgyzstan vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.