Guinea vs Jamaica: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Guinea
4,226 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Jamaica
4,208 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
43rd
Jamaica rank
44th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Guinea
  • Jamaica
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 4,226 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,208 real chained 2019 US$ in Jamaica, a difference of 18 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 43rd and Jamaica ranks 44th of 151 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Jamaica Difference Ahead
1990s 6,909 real chained 2019 US$ 5,121 real chained 2019 US$ 1,788 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2000s 6,006 real chained 2019 US$ 4,683 real chained 2019 US$ 1,323 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2010s 4,851 real chained 2019 US$ 4,265 real chained 2019 US$ 585.55 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea
2020s 4,226 real chained 2019 US$ 4,208 real chained 2019 US$ 17.86 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Guinea or Jamaica?
Guinea, at 4,226 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,208 real chained 2019 US$ in Jamaica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Guinea and Jamaica?
18 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Jamaica?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Jamaica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Guinea ranks 43rd and Jamaica ranks 44th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Jamaica: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guinea/jamaica/">Guinea vs Jamaica: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.