Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Guinea-Bissau
3,665 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
3,874 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
53rd
Namibia rank
50th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 209 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 50th of 151 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 4,975 real chained 2019 US$ 5,706 real chained 2019 US$ 731.12 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2000s 4,650 real chained 2019 US$ 4,957 real chained 2019 US$ 306.51 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2010s 4,038 real chained 2019 US$ 4,264 real chained 2019 US$ 225.7 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia
2020s 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ 209.31 real chained 2019 US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Namibia, at 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
209 real chained 2019 US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/namibia/">Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.