Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Guatemala
3,632 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
3,665 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
55th
Guinea-Bissau rank
53rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Guatemala
  • Guinea-Bissau
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,632 real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 33 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 53rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 6,751 real chained 2019 US$ 4,975 real chained 2019 US$ 1,777 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 5,693 real chained 2019 US$ 4,650 real chained 2019 US$ 1,043 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2010s 3,966 real chained 2019 US$ 4,038 real chained 2019 US$ 72.22 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 3,632 real chained 2019 US$ 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ 32.9 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Guatemala or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 3,665 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,632 real chained 2019 US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
33 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Guatemala ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/guinea-bissau/">Guatemala vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.