Germany vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Germany
1,443 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kazakhstan
1,612 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Germany rank
125th
Kazakhstan rank
122nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Germany
  • Kazakhstan
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 1,612 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany, a difference of 169 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 122nd of 151 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 1,527 real chained 2019 US$ 1,987 real chained 2019 US$ 459.96 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2000s 1,491 real chained 2019 US$ 1,973 real chained 2019 US$ 481.92 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2010s 1,478 real chained 2019 US$ 1,758 real chained 2019 US$ 280.51 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan
2020s 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ 1,612 real chained 2019 US$ 168.97 real chained 2019 US$ Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Germany or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 1,612 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Germany and Kazakhstan?
169 real chained 2019 US$, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Kazakhstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Germany and Kazakhstan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Germany ranks 125th and Kazakhstan ranks 122nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/germany/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/germany/kazakhstan/">Germany vs Kazakhstan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.