Ecuador vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Ecuador
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 119 real chained 2019 US$.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,048 real chained 2019 US$ | 1,858 real chained 2019 US$ | 1,190 real chained 2019 US$ | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 2,515 real chained 2019 US$ | 1,908 real chained 2019 US$ | 607.78 real chained 2019 US$ | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 1,790 real chained 2019 US$ | 1,704 real chained 2019 US$ | 86.93 real chained 2019 US$ | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ | 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ | 118.93 real chained 2019 US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Ecuador or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 119 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Ecuador ranks 127th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.