Ecuador vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Ecuador
1,399 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Germany
1,443 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
127th
Germany rank
125th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Ecuador
  • Germany
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Germany currently reports 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 44 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 127th and Germany ranks 125th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Germany in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 3,048 real chained 2019 US$ 1,527 real chained 2019 US$ 1,521 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 2,515 real chained 2019 US$ 1,491 real chained 2019 US$ 1,024 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 1,790 real chained 2019 US$ 1,478 real chained 2019 US$ 312.94 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ 43.59 real chained 2019 US$ Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Ecuador or Germany?
Germany, at 1,443 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,399 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Ecuador and Germany?
44 real chained 2019 US$, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Germany rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Ecuador ranks 127th and Germany ranks 125th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/germany/">Ecuador vs Germany: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.