Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Costa Rica
8,247 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania
7,679 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
9th
Lithuania rank
12th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Lithuania
05.0k10.0k15.0k199520072020

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 8,247 real chained 2019 US$ against 7,679 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 568 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 151 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 12,598 real chained 2019 US$ 7,001 real chained 2019 US$ 5,597 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica
2000s 10,210 real chained 2019 US$ 6,120 real chained 2019 US$ 4,090 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica
2010s 8,849 real chained 2019 US$ 7,276 real chained 2019 US$ 1,573 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica
2020s 8,247 real chained 2019 US$ 7,679 real chained 2019 US$ 567.63 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Costa Rica or Lithuania?
Costa Rica, at 8,247 real chained 2019 US$ against 7,679 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Costa Rica and Lithuania?
568 real chained 2019 US$, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Costa Rica and Lithuania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Costa Rica ranks 9th and Lithuania ranks 12th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/lithuania/">Costa Rica vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.