Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Colombia
1,407 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,518 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
126th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Colombia
  • Zimbabwe
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia, a difference of 111 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,799 real chained 2019 US$ 1,858 real chained 2019 US$ 58.92 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 1,908 real chained 2019 US$ 397.15 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 1,431 real chained 2019 US$ 1,704 real chained 2019 US$ 272.49 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ 111.12 real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Colombia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1,518 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Colombia and Zimbabwe?
111 real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Colombia ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/zimbabwe/">Colombia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.