Colombia vs Switzerland: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Colombia
1,407 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Switzerland
1,369 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
126th
Switzerland rank
128th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Colombia
  • Switzerland
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,369 real chained 2019 US$ in Switzerland, a difference of 38 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 126th and Switzerland ranks 128th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Switzerland Difference Ahead
1990s 1,799 real chained 2019 US$ 1,747 real chained 2019 US$ 51.84 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2000s 1,510 real chained 2019 US$ 1,644 real chained 2019 US$ 133.06 real chained 2019 US$ Switzerland
2010s 1,431 real chained 2019 US$ 1,456 real chained 2019 US$ 25.19 real chained 2019 US$ Switzerland
2020s 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ 1,369 real chained 2019 US$ 37.6 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Colombia or Switzerland?
Colombia, at 1,407 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,369 real chained 2019 US$ in Switzerland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Colombia and Switzerland?
38 real chained 2019 US$, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Switzerland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Switzerland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Colombia ranks 126th and Switzerland ranks 128th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Switzerland: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/switzerland/">Colombia vs Switzerland: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.