Chile vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Chile
2,719 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia
2,768 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
81st
Saint Lucia rank
80th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Chile
  • Saint Lucia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 49 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Chile ranks 81st and Saint Lucia ranks 80th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,435 real chained 2019 US$ 5,357 real chained 2019 US$ 1,923 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2000s 3,243 real chained 2019 US$ 3,512 real chained 2019 US$ 268.93 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia
2010s 2,947 real chained 2019 US$ 2,835 real chained 2019 US$ 111.93 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ 48.84 real chained 2019 US$ Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Chile or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 2,768 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Chile and Saint Lucia?
49 real chained 2019 US$, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Chile ranks 81st and Saint Lucia ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/chile/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/chile/st-lucia/">Chile vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.