Cambodia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Cambodia
6,648 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
6,571 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Cambodia rank
17th
Serbia rank
19th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Cambodia
  • Serbia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 6,648 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia, a difference of 77 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 19th of 151 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 7,235 real chained 2019 US$ 6,274 real chained 2019 US$ 961.18 real chained 2019 US$ Cambodia
2010s 6,840 real chained 2019 US$ 6,341 real chained 2019 US$ 499 real chained 2019 US$ Cambodia
2020s 6,648 real chained 2019 US$ 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ 76.77 real chained 2019 US$ Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Cambodia or Serbia?
Cambodia, at 6,648 real chained 2019 US$ against 6,571 real chained 2019 US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Cambodia and Serbia?
77 real chained 2019 US$, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Cambodia and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Cambodia ranks 17th and Serbia ranks 19th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/cambodia/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/cambodia/serbia/">Cambodia vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.