Burundi vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Burundi
2,817 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Slovenia
2,787 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burundi rank
76th
Slovenia rank
77th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Burundi
  • Slovenia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 2,817 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovenia, a difference of 30 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Burundi has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 76th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 151 countries.

Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 5,524 real chained 2019 US$ 2,463 real chained 2019 US$ 3,061 real chained 2019 US$ Burundi
2000s 4,283 real chained 2019 US$ 2,524 real chained 2019 US$ 1,759 real chained 2019 US$ Burundi
2010s 3,213 real chained 2019 US$ 2,863 real chained 2019 US$ 350.3 real chained 2019 US$ Burundi
2020s 2,817 real chained 2019 US$ 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ 29.54 real chained 2019 US$ Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Burundi or Slovenia?
Burundi, at 2,817 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,787 real chained 2019 US$ in Slovenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Burundi and Slovenia?
30 real chained 2019 US$, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Burundi and Slovenia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Burundi ranks 76th and Slovenia ranks 77th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/burundi/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/burundi/slovenia/">Burundi vs Slovenia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.