Belgium vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Belgium
1,780 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,749 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
119th
Montenegro rank
120th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Belgium
  • Montenegro
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 1,780 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,749 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 31 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Montenegro ahead.

Belgium ranks 119th and Montenegro ranks 120th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,918 real chained 2019 US$ 3,506 real chained 2019 US$ 1,587 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2010s 1,797 real chained 2019 US$ 2,203 real chained 2019 US$ 405.73 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro
2020s 1,780 real chained 2019 US$ 1,749 real chained 2019 US$ 31.39 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Belgium or Montenegro?
Belgium, at 1,780 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,749 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Belgium and Montenegro?
31 real chained 2019 US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Belgium ranks 119th and Montenegro ranks 120th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/montenegro/">Belgium vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.