Belarus vs El Salvador: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Belarus
2,026 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
El Salvador
1,975 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
109th
El Salvador rank
111th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Belarus
  • El Salvador
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 2,026 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,975 real chained 2019 US$ in El Salvador, a difference of 51 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was El Salvador ahead.

Belarus ranks 109th and El Salvador ranks 111th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and El Salvador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus El Salvador Difference Ahead
1990s 2,113 real chained 2019 US$ 2,498 real chained 2019 US$ 384.9 real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador
2000s 2,126 real chained 2019 US$ 2,270 real chained 2019 US$ 143.85 real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador
2010s 2,096 real chained 2019 US$ 2,056 real chained 2019 US$ 40.34 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus
2020s 2,026 real chained 2019 US$ 1,975 real chained 2019 US$ 51.12 real chained 2019 US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Belarus or El Salvador?
Belarus, at 2,026 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,975 real chained 2019 US$ in El Salvador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Belarus and El Salvador?
51 real chained 2019 US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and El Salvador?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and El Salvador rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Belarus ranks 109th and El Salvador ranks 111th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs El Salvador: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/el-salvador/">Belarus vs El Salvador: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.