Azerbaijan vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Azerbaijan
2,783 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile
2,719 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Azerbaijan rank
78th
Chile rank
81st

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Chile
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 2,783 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile, a difference of 64 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Chile ranks 81st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 3,446 real chained 2019 US$ 3,435 real chained 2019 US$ 11.46 real chained 2019 US$ Azerbaijan
2000s 3,327 real chained 2019 US$ 3,243 real chained 2019 US$ 83.64 real chained 2019 US$ Azerbaijan
2010s 2,934 real chained 2019 US$ 2,947 real chained 2019 US$ 13.04 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 2,783 real chained 2019 US$ 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ 63.79 real chained 2019 US$ Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Azerbaijan or Chile?
Azerbaijan, at 2,783 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,719 real chained 2019 US$ in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Azerbaijan and Chile?
64 real chained 2019 US$, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Chile?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Azerbaijan and Chile rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Chile ranks 81st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/azerbaijan/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/azerbaijan/chile/">Azerbaijan vs Chile: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.