Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Argentina
3,881 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Namibia
3,874 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
49th
Namibia rank
50th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Argentina
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 3,881 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia, a difference of 7 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Argentina ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 50th of 151 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 5,820 real chained 2019 US$ 5,706 real chained 2019 US$ 114.44 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina
2000s 5,379 real chained 2019 US$ 4,957 real chained 2019 US$ 422.72 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina
2010s 4,477 real chained 2019 US$ 4,264 real chained 2019 US$ 213.27 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina
2020s 3,881 real chained 2019 US$ 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ 6.94 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Argentina or Namibia?
Argentina, at 3,881 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,874 real chained 2019 US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Argentina and Namibia?
7 real chained 2019 US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Argentina ranks 49th and Namibia ranks 50th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/namibia/">Argentina vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.