Angola vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Angola
2,661 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mauritius
2,630 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Angola rank
87th
Mauritius rank
88th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Angola
  • Mauritius
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Angola currently reports 2,661 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,630 real chained 2019 US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 31 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 87th and Mauritius ranks 88th of 151 countries.

Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 4,889 real chained 2019 US$ 3,448 real chained 2019 US$ 1,441 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2000s 4,042 real chained 2019 US$ 3,058 real chained 2019 US$ 983.6 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2010s 3,121 real chained 2019 US$ 2,670 real chained 2019 US$ 450.95 real chained 2019 US$ Angola
2020s 2,661 real chained 2019 US$ 2,630 real chained 2019 US$ 30.94 real chained 2019 US$ Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Angola or Mauritius?
Angola, at 2,661 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,630 real chained 2019 US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Angola and Mauritius?
31 real chained 2019 US$, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Mauritius?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Angola ranks 87th and Mauritius ranks 88th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/angola/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/angola/mauritius/">Angola vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.