Serbia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland
Serbia
3,933 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
4,087 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
15th
Tunisia rank
13th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 4,087 current US$ against 3,933 current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 154 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tunisia ahead.
Serbia ranks 15th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 151 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3,263 current US$ | 3,705 current US$ | 441.99 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 3,438 current US$ | 3,902 current US$ | 464.89 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 3,933 current US$ | 4,087 current US$ | 153.46 current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 4,087 current US$ against 3,933 current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 154 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland?
- Serbia ranks 15th and Tunisia ranks 13th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.