Panama vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland
Panama
1,144 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,117 current US$
in 2020
Panama rank
108th
Zambia rank
111th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- Panama
- Zambia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 1,144 current US$ against 1,117 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 27 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 111th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 949.5 current US$ | 780.31 current US$ | 169.19 current US$ | Panama |
| 2000s | 755.04 current US$ | 814.3 current US$ | 59.26 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,032 current US$ | 1,477 current US$ | 445.25 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,144 current US$ | 1,117 current US$ | 26.17 current US$ | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland, Panama or Zambia?
- Panama, at 1,144 current US$ against 1,117 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland between Panama and Zambia?
- 27 current US$, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Panama and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland?
- Panama ranks 108th and Zambia ranks 111th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.