Italy vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland
Italy
1,405 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
1,365 current US$
in 2020
Italy rank
91st
Suriname rank
94th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- Italy
- Suriname
How they compare
Italy currently reports 1,405 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 40 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 91st and Suriname ranks 94th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,252 current US$ | 1,093 current US$ | 1,159 current US$ | Italy |
| 2000s | 1,450 current US$ | 872.64 current US$ | 577.57 current US$ | Italy |
| 2010s | 1,457 current US$ | 1,528 current US$ | 70.35 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,405 current US$ | 1,365 current US$ | 40.06 current US$ | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland, Italy or Suriname?
- Italy, at 1,405 current US$ against 1,365 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland between Italy and Suriname?
- 40 current US$, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Italy and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland?
- Italy ranks 91st and Suriname ranks 94th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.