Brazil vs Congo: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland
Brazil
1,003 current US$
in 2020
Congo
1,008 current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
120th
Congo rank
119th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- Brazil
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 1,008 current US$ against 1,003 current US$ in Brazil, a difference of 5 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 120th and Congo ranks 119th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 792.14 current US$ | 709.95 current US$ | 82.19 current US$ | Brazil |
| 2000s | 608.86 current US$ | 1,275 current US$ | 665.91 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,224 current US$ | 1,648 current US$ | 424.01 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 1,003 current US$ | 1,008 current US$ | 4.44 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland, Brazil or Congo?
- Congo, at 1,008 current US$ against 1,003 current US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland between Brazil and Congo?
- 5 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland?
- Brazil ranks 120th and Congo ranks 119th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.