Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland

Belarus
1,257 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
1,208 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
100th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
102nd

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland over time

  • Belarus
  • Sao Tome and Principe
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 1,257 current US$ against 1,208 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 49 current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 100th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 151 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 2,199 current US$ 1,187 current US$ 1,012 current US$ Belarus
2000s 2,014 current US$ 1,236 current US$ 778.34 current US$ Belarus
2010s 1,585 current US$ 1,550 current US$ 34.58 current US$ Belarus
2020s 1,257 current US$ 1,208 current US$ 49.3 current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland, Belarus or Sao Tome and Principe?
Belarus, at 1,257 current US$ against 1,208 current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland between Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
49 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland?
Belarus ranks 100th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 102nd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland. Statizoid. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-pastureland-current-us/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-pastureland-current-us/belarus/sao-tome-and-principe/">Belarus vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed