Sri Lanka vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Sri Lanka
4,057 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
3,891 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka rank
51st
Sudan rank
53rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Sri Lanka
- Sudan
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4,057 current US$ against 3,891 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 166 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 51st and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,372 current US$ | 3,840 current US$ | 468.19 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 4,057 current US$ | 3,891 current US$ | 165.39 current US$ | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Sri Lanka or Sudan?
- Sri Lanka, at 4,057 current US$ against 3,891 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 166 current US$, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Sri Lanka and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Sri Lanka ranks 51st and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.