Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Rwanda
4,140 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
4,057 current US$
in 2020
Rwanda rank
50th
Sri Lanka rank
51st
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 4,140 current US$ against 4,057 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 83 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 50th and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 151 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,312 current US$ | 2,080 current US$ | 232.6 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 2,657 current US$ | 1,789 current US$ | 868.66 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4,568 current US$ | 3,294 current US$ | 1,274 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 4,140 current US$ | 4,057 current US$ | 82.92 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 4,140 current US$ against 4,057 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 83 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Rwanda ranks 50th and Sri Lanka ranks 51st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.