Philippines vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Philippines
3,797 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
3,891 current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
54th
Sudan rank
53rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Philippines
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 3,891 current US$ against 3,797 current US$ in Philippines, a difference of 94 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 54th and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,904 current US$ | 3,840 current US$ | 63.43 current US$ | Philippines |
| 2020s | 3,797 current US$ | 3,891 current US$ | 94.25 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Philippines or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 3,891 current US$ against 3,797 current US$ in Philippines as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Philippines and Sudan?
- 94 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Philippines and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Philippines ranks 54th and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.