Namibia vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land

Namibia
4,048 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
3,891 current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
52nd
Sudan rank
53rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time

  • Namibia
  • Sudan
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 4,048 current US$ against 3,891 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 157 current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 53rd of 150 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 3,099 current US$ 3,840 current US$ 740.78 current US$ Sudan
2020s 4,048 current US$ 3,891 current US$ 157.03 current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Namibia or Sudan?
Namibia, at 4,048 current US$ against 3,891 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Namibia and Sudan?
157 current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
Namibia ranks 52nd and Sudan ranks 53rd of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed