South Korea vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
South Korea
2,080 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
2,120 current US$
in 2020
South Korea rank
107th
Zambia rank
105th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- South Korea
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 2,120 current US$ against 2,080 current US$ in South Korea, a difference of 40 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 105th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,741 current US$ | 1,225 current US$ | 516.34 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2000s | 2,078 current US$ | 1,441 current US$ | 637.17 current US$ | South Korea |
| 2010s | 2,379 current US$ | 2,718 current US$ | 339.35 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 2,080 current US$ | 2,120 current US$ | 40.33 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, South Korea or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 2,120 current US$ against 2,080 current US$ in South Korea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between South Korea and Zambia?
- 40 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do South Korea and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- South Korea ranks 107th and Zambia ranks 105th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.