Comoros vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Comoros
2,111 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
2,120 current US$
in 2020
Comoros rank
106th
Zambia rank
105th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Comoros
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 2,120 current US$ against 2,111 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 9 current US$.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 105th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 3 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,737 current US$ | 1,225 current US$ | 511.68 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2000s | 1,866 current US$ | 1,441 current US$ | 425.59 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2010s | 3,105 current US$ | 2,718 current US$ | 387.3 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2020s | 2,111 current US$ | 2,120 current US$ | 8.67 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Comoros or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 2,120 current US$ against 2,111 current US$ in Comoros as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Comoros and Zambia?
- 9 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Comoros and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Comoros ranks 106th and Zambia ranks 105th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.