Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Chile
2,728 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
2,714 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
84th
Suriname rank
85th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Chile currently reports 2,728 current US$ against 2,714 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 14 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.
Chile ranks 84th and Suriname ranks 85th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,398 current US$ | 2,100 current US$ | 702.57 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 941.45 current US$ | 1,699 current US$ | 757.58 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2,382 current US$ | 3,024 current US$ | 642.08 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 2,728 current US$ | 2,714 current US$ | 13.8 current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Chile or Suriname?
- Chile, at 2,728 current US$ against 2,714 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Chile and Suriname?
- 14 current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Chile ranks 84th and Suriname ranks 85th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.