Belgium vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Belgium
1,687 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
1,734 current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
120th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Belgium
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1,734 current US$ against 1,687 current US$ in Belgium, a difference of 47 current US$.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 151 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,741 current US$ | 593.96 current US$ | 1,147 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 1,636 current US$ | 1,436 current US$ | 200.55 current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1,748 current US$ | 2,201 current US$ | 453.29 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1,687 current US$ | 1,734 current US$ | 46.41 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Belgium or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1,734 current US$ against 1,687 current US$ in Belgium as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 47 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Belgium ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 120th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.