Belarus vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Belarus
2,025 current US$
in 2020
Iceland
1,987 current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
110th
Iceland rank
113th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Belarus
- Iceland
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2,025 current US$ against 1,987 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 38 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 110th and Iceland ranks 113th of 151 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,732 current US$ | 2,336 current US$ | 1,396 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3,477 current US$ | 1,342 current US$ | 2,135 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2010s | 2,644 current US$ | 1,728 current US$ | 916.66 current US$ | Belarus |
| 2020s | 2,025 current US$ | 1,987 current US$ | 37.75 current US$ | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Belarus or Iceland?
- Belarus, at 2,025 current US$ against 1,987 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Belarus and Iceland?
- 38 current US$, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Belarus ranks 110th and Iceland ranks 113th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.