Argentina vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land
Argentina
3,709 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
3,891 current US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
55th
Sudan rank
53rd
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land over time
- Argentina
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 3,891 current US$ against 3,709 current US$ in Argentina, a difference of 182 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,795 current US$ | 3,840 current US$ | 45.25 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 3,709 current US$ | 3,891 current US$ | 182.89 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land, Argentina or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 3,891 current US$ against 3,709 current US$ in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land between Argentina and Sudan?
- 182 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Sudan ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.