South Africa vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
South Africa
1,511 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
1,644 current US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
65th
Sudan rank
62nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 1,644 current US$ against 1,511 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 133 current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 65th and Sudan ranks 62nd of 151 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1,532 current US$ | 1,660 current US$ | 128.18 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 1,511 current US$ | 1,644 current US$ | 132.5 current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, South Africa or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 1,644 current US$ against 1,511 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between South Africa and Sudan?
- 133 current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- South Africa ranks 65th and Sudan ranks 62nd of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.