Serbia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
Serbia
3,507 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
3,506 current US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
17th
Tunisia rank
18th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- Serbia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 3,507 current US$ against 3,506 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 1 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Tunisia ahead.
Serbia ranks 17th and Tunisia ranks 18th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,805 current US$ | 3,166 current US$ | 361.63 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 3,005 current US$ | 3,337 current US$ | 332.3 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 3,507 current US$ | 3,506 current US$ | 1.35 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Serbia or Tunisia?
- Serbia, at 3,507 current US$ against 3,506 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Serbia and Tunisia?
- 1 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Serbia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- Serbia ranks 17th and Tunisia ranks 18th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.