Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
Rwanda
2,001 current US$
in 2020
Sri Lanka
1,991 current US$
in 2020
Rwanda rank
47th
Sri Lanka rank
48th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2,001 current US$ against 1,991 current US$ in Sri Lanka, a difference of 10 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 151 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,070 current US$ | 1,019 current US$ | 51.24 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 1,266 current US$ | 882.85 current US$ | 382.85 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 2,197 current US$ | 1,619 current US$ | 578.18 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 2,001 current US$ | 1,991 current US$ | 10.36 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Rwanda, at 2,001 current US$ against 1,991 current US$ in Sri Lanka as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 10 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- Rwanda ranks 47th and Sri Lanka ranks 48th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.