Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland

Mauritius
1,166 current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
1,199 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius rank
88th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
85th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time

  • Mauritius
  • Sao Tome and Principe
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k199520072020

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1,199 current US$ against 1,166 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 33 current US$.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,884 current US$ 1,156 current US$ 728.01 current US$ Mauritius
2000s 1,378 current US$ 1,220 current US$ 157.01 current US$ Mauritius
2010s 1,572 current US$ 1,540 current US$ 32.24 current US$ Mauritius
2020s 1,166 current US$ 1,199 current US$ 33.44 current US$ Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Mauritius or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1,199 current US$ against 1,166 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
33 current US$, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
Mauritius ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 85th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-cropland-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-cropland-current-us/mauritius/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritius vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed