Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland

Kyrgyzstan
1,416 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
1,511 current US$
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
67th
South Africa rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • South Africa
5001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 1,511 current US$ against 1,416 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 95 current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 65th of 151 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 529.48 current US$ 878.32 current US$ 348.84 current US$ South Africa
2000s 844.18 current US$ 1,037 current US$ 192.36 current US$ South Africa
2010s 1,388 current US$ 1,557 current US$ 168.73 current US$ South Africa
2020s 1,416 current US$ 1,511 current US$ 95.23 current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Kyrgyzstan or South Africa?
South Africa, at 1,511 current US$ against 1,416 current US$ in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
95 current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Kyrgyzstan and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 67th and South Africa ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland. Statizoid. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-cropland-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-agricultural-land-cropland-current-us/kyrgyz-republic/south-africa/">Kyrgyzstan vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed