Congo vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
Congo
831.78 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
798.37 current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
111th
Zimbabwe rank
114th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- Congo
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Congo currently reports 831.78 current US$ against 798.37 current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 33.41 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 151 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 634.61 current US$ | 147.86 current US$ | 486.75 current US$ | Congo |
| 2000s | 1,032 current US$ | 600.31 current US$ | 431.94 current US$ | Congo |
| 2010s | 1,154 current US$ | 951.41 current US$ | 203.08 current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 831.78 current US$ | 798.37 current US$ | 33.41 current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Congo or Zimbabwe?
- Congo, at 831.78 current US$ against 798.37 current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 33.41 current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- Congo ranks 111th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.