China vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
China
4,317 current US$
in 2020
Lithuania
4,242 current US$
in 2020
China rank
8th
Lithuania rank
9th
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- China
- Lithuania
How they compare
China currently reports 4,317 current US$ against 4,242 current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 75 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.
China ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 151 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,001 current US$ | 986.1 current US$ | 15.34 current US$ | China |
| 2000s | 1,706 current US$ | 1,316 current US$ | 389.41 current US$ | China |
| 2010s | 3,730 current US$ | 2,987 current US$ | 742.9 current US$ | China |
| 2020s | 4,317 current US$ | 4,242 current US$ | 75.36 current US$ | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, China or Lithuania?
- China, at 4,317 current US$ against 4,242 current US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between China and Lithuania?
- 75 current US$, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Lithuania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do China and Lithuania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- China ranks 8th and Lithuania ranks 9th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.