Chile vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland
Chile
1,318 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
1,350 current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
73rd
Suriname rank
71st
Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 1,350 current US$ against 1,318 current US$ in Chile, a difference of 32 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.
Chile ranks 73rd and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 591.03 current US$ | 1,008 current US$ | 416.54 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2000s | 427.51 current US$ | 826.39 current US$ | 398.88 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2010s | 1,141 current US$ | 1,497 current US$ | 355.52 current US$ | Suriname |
| 2020s | 1,318 current US$ | 1,350 current US$ | 31.59 current US$ | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland, Chile or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 1,350 current US$ against 1,318 current US$ in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland between Chile and Suriname?
- 32 current US$, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland?
- Chile ranks 73rd and Suriname ranks 71st of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, agricultural land: cropland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.